Home | Instructions to Authors |SASE| Editorial Board | Articles | Subscriptions | Conference | Conference Program

 

Abstract

 

Glancey , J.L., A.E.M. Chirnside,  J. Hummel, S. Nobles, S. Chanpimol and A. Raval. 2007. Bio-fuel emission measurements and potential environmental implications for the Mid-Atlantic region. JEMREST 3:158-166.

 

DOI: 10.4029/2007jemrest3no126

 

In this study, the transient smoke emissions characteristics of three fuels were examined: an E-Diesel fuel (O2Diesel™: 7.7vol% biomass-derived fuel grade ethanol (ASTM D 4806), 0.6vol% proprietary co-solvent additive, and 91.7vol% no.2 diesel (ASTM D 975)), a B20 soy-diesel blend, and a conventional no. 2 diesel on-road fuel. Measurements of smoke emissions using each fuel in two commercial vehicles were made with a light extinction opacity meter and the SAE J1667 snap acceleration test method. Emission opacity from each engine was significantly reduced (p<0.05) with both the e-diesel and soy-diesel blends compared to No. 2 on-road diesel. In addition, opacity was significantly lower in both engines with the e-diesel blend compared to soy-diesel. Overall, relative to conventional petroleum diesel fuel, smoke emissions were reduced by 9% and 32% using the soy-diesel and e-diesel fuels, respectively. These results indicate that as part of a comprehensive air quality improvement program for the Mid-Atlantic region, e-diesel blends can provide significantly more emission reductions than biodiesel blends in diesel powered engines for both on- and off-road vehicles and power units.

 

 

Copyright © 2002-2009